Return to Wildland Fire
Return to Northern Bobwhite site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to SE Firemap
Return to the Landscape Partnership Literature Gateway Website
return
return to main site

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections

Personal tools

You are here: Home / Expertise Search / Brennan, Jean
481 items matching your search terms.
Filter the results.
Item type

























New items since



Sort by relevance · date (newest first) · alphabetically
File chemical/x-isostar AppLCC Species List
WG members -- I will attach a copy of the AppLCC species-habitat database we mentioned on the Jan 14/15 meeting, should that be helpful in your work. The following information was provided on how the data were assembled. (1.) Criteria used for assembling the species – i.e., SGCN, Listed/Proposed/Candidate etc. Criteria for assembling the original list were the SGNC species with the addition of federally listed species. (2) How was the habitat association was assigned (and if the habitat classification system was standardized when assigned). With the exception of mussels and fish (used Natureserve scheme for those) the habitat association is not based on any standard habitat classification scheme and is a very broad summary of the habitats listed in the source information. (3) How species were included (i.e., reference to the 75% range. All species that were found (even partially) within the AppLCC boundary were included in this list. Species listed on SWAPs, but not found within the LCC Boundary were deleted. If (by visual inspection of range maps found in the source material) more than 75% of a species range was found with the LCC Boundary, it was coded a YES in the LCC GLOBAL TRUST column - the thought behind this was that the LCC has a global responsibility to preserve those species. (4) Re: plants and what criteria was used to exclude species from the list). • Plants were not included because only one state (Georgia) and the federal list had plants listed (so the ranking of plant species when you do your "how many states is the species found in" analysis would have been heavily skewed, making them seem much less important than they actually are. To be true to the process, I would suggest getting plant lists from each state (maybe S1-S2 species). • Invertebrates were not included simply because I ran out of time cleaning up the list and range information for many of them is not easily available. I do believe they should be included in the final list of species. and would be happy to work on the invert list if you'd like...it would take some coordination with states to get range info. • The fish list was almost finished (data is readily available on Natureserve Explorer) (5) Re: migratory birds handled in assembling this data set. The original list of migratory birds was created using the same process as for all other species. The only difference is that they have two possible habitat associations - breeding habitat and wintering habitat (if applicable) because managing for both of these is important to their conservation. (6) Final note - there may be a few (less than ten) duplicate species because some states had a subspecies listed, while others had the only species listed.
Located in LP Members / / Project Documents / Content from AppLCC Staff
Content from AppLCC Staff
Contains any materials the CCVA Team has requested from AppLCC staff or staff thought might be helpful for the Team's work.
Located in LP Members / / Climate Change Workspace / Project Documents
File CASRI - 2012
Regarding major habitat restoration efforts across large areas of the AppLCC geography -- the Central Appalachian Spruce Restoration Initiative. This annual report is for the Northern portion of the range. A similar Initiative has begun in the Southern extent of the range through the TNC TN Chapter. The Southern Range Spruce distribution is more of a "sky island" distribution.
Located in LP Members / / Project Documents / Content from AppLCC Staff
by Dr. Rob Balwin, Clemson University. See Video, Model (PPT image), 1-pager briefing paper.
Located in LP Members / / Project Documents / Content from AppLCC Staff
File Best Practices ver. 2012-12-06
From the National LCC HQ: LCC Data Management Best Practices products of the Data Work Team (Sean Finn).
Located in Cooperative / / SC Data Issues Work Group / National LCC Data Management Working Group
Image Ecoregion - FWS
Map created by FWS in defining ecoregions - integration of major watershed to define regions.
Located in LP Members / / Climate Change Workspace / Maps and GIS-related Materials
Maps & GIS Materials
This folder contains various background materials on ecoregions across the AppLCC.
Located in Cooperative / / SC Meeting & Workshop, April 22-24, 2013 / SC Indicator and Surrogate Species Work Group
Species List & Habitat Association List
This folder contains a collection of species lists developed for the Appalachians from several different perspectives. The first 8 files are summary reports based on an Access database developed by the AppLCC. The underlying data exists elsewhere on the Portal as an Access Database and include listing by State. The database was developed from SWAP lists and FWS lists. The remaining lists are either earlier species lists developed by the AppLCC or species lists generated by partners. All of these are collected here to support development of a potential surrogate species list for the AppLCC.
Located in Cooperative / / SC Meeting & Workshop, April 22-24, 2013 / SC Indicator and Surrogate Species Work Group
FWS Region-5 NALCC Representative Species Approach
This folder contains background materials introducing the "representative species" approach Region-5 began prior to the formal adoption by the Service to promote a surrogate species approach (to inform landscape-level conservation.)
Located in SC Surrogate and Indicator Work Group / Resources
FWS Region-5 NALCC Representative Species Approach
This folder contains background materials introducing the "representative species" approach Region-5 began prior to the formal adoption by the Service to promote a surrogate species approach (to inform landscape-level conservation.)
Located in Cooperative / / SC Meeting & Workshop, April 22-24, 2013 / SC Indicator and Surrogate Species Work Group