Return to Wildland Fire
Return to Northern Bobwhite site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to SE Firemap
Return to the Landscape Partnership Literature Gateway Website
RETURN TO LANDSCAPE PARTNERSHIP SITE
return to main site

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections

Personal tools

You are here: Home
30 items matching your search terms.
Filter the results.
Item type
























New items since



Sort by relevance · date (newest first) · alphabetically
File Appalachian LCC Conservation Design: Phase 1
by Paul Leonard and Rob Baldwin published Jul 23, 2015 — filed under: ,
An overview of how this research developed a process of selecting priority resources by using LCC technical input to build a group of candidate priority resources and include them in a spatial modeling process to produce a draft landscape‐scale conservation design; identified additional priority resources to include in future iterations of the conservation design; and built and acquired datasets, derived data modeling strategies needed to achieve first two objectives.
Located in Cooperative / / Past SC Meetings and Materials / July 13-15, 2015 Appalachian LCC Steering Committee Meeting
File Priority Resources and Species: Next Phase
by Paul Leonard and Rob Baldwin published Jul 23, 2015 — filed under: , ,
Presentation to facilitate discussion around how to identify priority resources and species and what to implement in the next phase of conservation design project.
Located in Cooperative / / Past SC Meetings and Materials / July 13-15, 2015 Appalachian LCC Steering Committee Meeting
File Southeast Conservation Adaptation Strategy Presentation
by Dennis Figg published Jul 23, 2015 — filed under: ,
Focus on assembling an ecologically connected network of landscapes and seascapes.
Located in Cooperative / / Past SC Meetings and Materials / July 13-15, 2015 Appalachian LCC Steering Committee Meeting
Project C++ source code Interactive Conservation Planning for the Appalachian LCC
by Matthew Cimitile published Dec 12, 2014 last modified May 13, 2025 10:35 PM — filed under: , , ,
The Appalachian LCC is currently engaged in an effort to develop a draft regional conservation plan for the Cooperative using an interactive and iterative spatial prioritization framework. Using available data and modeling approaches that are well supported in the literature, researchers from Clemson University are developing conservation planning models that include site selection, ecological threat assessments, and broad ranging habitat and ecological connectivity analyses.
Located in Research
by admin published Mar 26, 2021 last modified Mar 31, 2021 11:23 AM — filed under: , , , , , , ,
The Floodplain Prioritization Tool helps decision-makers identify critical opportunities for floodplain protection and restoration in the Mississippi River Basin. It is an interactive, web-based mapping tool. Users can prioritize different criteria (e.g., water quality, wildlife habitat, and human exposure to flooding) on the map to see where floodplain restoration and conservation is likely to have the greatest impact. Developed by The Nature Conservancy and partners.
Located in Apps, Maps, & Data / Landscape Partnership Spatial Datasets / Aquatic and Freshwater Spatial Data
File Protected Areas: Goals, Limitations, and Design
by Jessica Rhodes published Aug 12, 2015 — filed under: , ,
This reference focuses on the functions, design, and limitations of protected areas and the processes of conservation planning.
Located in Technical Resources / / Marxan Training Resources / Marxan Training Suggested Readings
File Applying ecological criteria to marine reserve design: A case study from the California Channel Islands
by Jessica Rhodes published Aug 12, 2015 — filed under: , , , ,
Reference which describes the steps involved in designing a network of marine reserves for conservation and fisheries management.
Located in Technical Resources / / Marxan Training Resources / Marxan Training Suggested Readings
File Energy Assessment News Release
by Matthew Cimitile published Mar 05, 2015 last modified Mar 05, 2015 10:44 AM — filed under: , , , ,
A new study and online mapping tool by the Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC) and The Nature Conservancy are intended to inform discussions among conservation agencies and organizations, industry, policy makers, regulators and the public on how to protect essential natural resources while realizing the benefits of increased domestic energy production.
Located in Tools & Resources / Assessing Future Energy Development
File Conservation Strategy for Imperiled Aquatic Species in the UTRB
by Jessica Rhodes published Feb 14, 2015 last modified Jan 12, 2016 10:47 AM — filed under: , , , , , , ,
The Strategy provides guidance to Field Offices in reevaluating current ("status quo") conservation approaches in order to deliver the most cost effective approach toward the conservation and management of imperiled freshwater fish and mussel species in the Upper Tennessee River Basin.
Located in The Strategy
File Conservation in the face of climate change: The roles of alternative models, monitoring, and adaptation in confronting and reducing uncertainty
by Jessica Rhodes published Jun 22, 2015 — filed under: , , , ,
The broad physical and biological principles behind climate change and its potential large scale ecological impacts on biota are fairly well understood, although likely responses of biotic communities at fine spatio-temporal scales are not, limiting the ability of conservation programs to respond effectively to climate change outside the range of human experience. Much of the climate debate has focused on attempts to resolve key uncertainties in a hypothesis-testing framework. However, conservation decisions cannot await resolution of these scientific issues and instead must proceed in the face of uncertainty. We suggest that conservation should precede in an adaptive management framework, in which decisions are guided by predictions under multiple, plausible hypotheses about climate impacts. Under this plan, monitoring is used to evaluate the response of the system to climate drivers, and management actions (perhaps experimental) are used to confront testable predictions with data, in turn providing feedback for future decision making. We illustrate these principles with the problem of mitigating the effects of climate change on terrestrial bird communities in the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA.
Located in Reports & Documents