-
Appalachian LCC Conservation Design: Phase 1
-
by
Paul Leonard and Rob Baldwin
—
published
Jul 23, 2015
—
filed under:
Steering Committee,
Conservation Planning
An overview of how this research developed a process of selecting priority
resources by using LCC technical input to build a group of candidate priority resources and include them in a spatial modeling process to produce a draft landscape‐scale conservation design; identified additional priority resources to include in future iterations of the conservation design; and built and acquired datasets, derived data modeling strategies needed to achieve first two objectives.
Located in
Cooperative
/
…
/
Past SC Meetings and Materials
/
July 13-15, 2015 Appalachian LCC Steering Committee Meeting
-
Priority Resources and Species: Next Phase
-
by
Paul Leonard and Rob Baldwin
—
published
Jul 23, 2015
—
filed under:
Steering Committee,
Priority Species,
Conservation Planning
Presentation to facilitate discussion around how to identify priority resources and species and what to implement in the next phase of conservation design project.
Located in
Cooperative
/
…
/
Past SC Meetings and Materials
/
July 13-15, 2015 Appalachian LCC Steering Committee Meeting
-
Southeast Conservation Adaptation Strategy Presentation
-
by
Dennis Figg
—
published
Jul 23, 2015
—
filed under:
Steering Committee,
Conservation Planning
Focus on assembling an ecologically connected network of landscapes and seascapes.
Located in
Cooperative
/
…
/
Past SC Meetings and Materials
/
July 13-15, 2015 Appalachian LCC Steering Committee Meeting
-
Interactive Conservation Planning for the Appalachian LCC
-
by
Matthew Cimitile
—
published
Dec 12, 2014
—
last modified
May 13, 2025 10:35 PM
—
filed under:
Conservation Planning,
AppLCC Funded,
Data Needs and GIS,
Research
The Appalachian LCC is currently engaged in an effort to develop a draft regional conservation plan for the Cooperative using an interactive and iterative spatial prioritization framework. Using available data and modeling approaches that are well supported in the literature, researchers from Clemson University are developing conservation planning models that include site selection, ecological threat assessments, and broad ranging habitat and ecological connectivity analyses.
Located in
Research
-
Floodplain Prioritization Tool
-
by
admin
—
published
Mar 26, 2021
—
last modified
Mar 31, 2021 11:23 AM
—
filed under:
The Nature Conservancy,
Floodplain,
Spatial Data,
Aquatic ecosystems,
Water,
Flood,
Conservation Planning,
Freshwater
The Floodplain Prioritization Tool helps decision-makers identify critical opportunities for floodplain protection and restoration in the Mississippi River Basin. It is an interactive, web-based mapping tool.
Users can prioritize different criteria (e.g., water quality, wildlife habitat, and human exposure to flooding) on the map to see where floodplain restoration and conservation is likely to have the greatest impact. Developed by The Nature Conservancy and partners.
Located in
Apps, Maps, & Data
/
Landscape Partnership Spatial Datasets
/
Aquatic and Freshwater Spatial Data
-
Protected Areas: Goals, Limitations, and Design
-
by
Jessica Rhodes
—
published
Aug 12, 2015
—
filed under:
Conservation Planning,
Conservation,
Scientific Publications
This reference focuses on the functions, design, and limitations of protected areas and the processes of conservation planning.
Located in
Technical Resources
/
…
/
Marxan Training Resources
/
Marxan Training Suggested Readings
-
Applying ecological criteria to marine reserve design: A case study from the California Channel Islands
-
by
Jessica Rhodes
—
published
Aug 12, 2015
—
filed under:
Literature,
Fish,
Conservation Planning,
Conservation,
Scientific Publications
Reference which describes the steps involved in designing a network of marine reserves for conservation and fisheries management.
Located in
Technical Resources
/
…
/
Marxan Training Resources
/
Marxan Training Suggested Readings
-
Energy Assessment News Release
-
by
Matthew Cimitile
—
published
Mar 05, 2015
—
last modified
Mar 05, 2015 10:44 AM
—
filed under:
Energy,
Our Work,
Research,
Energy Forecast,
Conservation Planning
A new study and online mapping tool by the Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC) and The Nature Conservancy are intended to inform discussions among conservation agencies and organizations, industry, policy makers, regulators and the public on how to protect essential natural resources while realizing the benefits of increased domestic energy production.
Located in
Tools & Resources
/
Assessing Future Energy Development
-
Conservation Strategy for Imperiled Aquatic Species in the UTRB
-
by
Jessica Rhodes
—
published
Feb 14, 2015
—
last modified
Jan 12, 2016 10:47 AM
—
filed under:
Partners or Partnerships,
Federal,
Fish,
Endangered Species,
Partnership,
Priority Species,
Conservation,
Conservation Planning
The Strategy provides guidance to Field Offices in reevaluating current ("status quo") conservation approaches in order to deliver the most cost effective approach toward the conservation and management of imperiled freshwater fish and mussel species in the Upper Tennessee River Basin.
Located in
The Strategy
-
Conservation in the face of climate change: The roles of alternative models, monitoring, and adaptation in confronting and reducing uncertainty
-
by
Jessica Rhodes
—
published
Jun 22, 2015
—
filed under:
Climate Change,
Conservation,
Birds,
Appalachia,
Conservation Planning
The broad physical and biological principles behind climate change and its potential large scale ecological impacts on biota are fairly well understood, although likely responses of biotic communities at fine spatio-temporal scales are not, limiting the ability of conservation programs to respond effectively to climate change outside the range of human experience. Much of the climate debate has focused on attempts to resolve key uncertainties in a hypothesis-testing framework. However, conservation decisions cannot await resolution of these scientific issues and instead must proceed in the face of uncertainty. We suggest that conservation should precede in an adaptive management framework, in which decisions are guided by predictions under multiple, plausible hypotheses about climate impacts. Under this plan, monitoring is used to evaluate the response of the system to climate drivers, and management actions (perhaps experimental) are used to confront testable predictions with data, in turn providing feedback for future decision making. We illustrate these principles with the problem of mitigating the effects of climate change on terrestrial bird communities in the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA.
Located in
Reports & Documents