Return to Wildland Fire
Return to Northern Bobwhite site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to SE Firemap
Return to the Landscape Partnership Literature Gateway Website
RETURN TO LANDSCAPE PARTNERSHIP SITE
return to main site

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections

Personal tools

You are here: Home

Modified items

All recently modified items, latest first.
Forest Systems
 
ARC Assessment of Natural Assets in the Appalachian Region - Forest Resources
Assessment of Natural Assets in the Appalachian Region-Forest Resources. Prepared for the ARC, 2014
Grassland Systems
 
GoogleDoc_Challenges_LCC_Coord
 
GoogleDoc: Plan for Project Manager
 
GoogleDoc: State of Appalachia
 
GoogleDoc_Challenges_LCC Coord
 
GoogleDoc: Position Paper
Develop a “position paper” of vision, goals over next few years (Gwen to serve as lead) Bridgett Costanzo, Bill Jenkins, Perry Wheelock ID workplan, work groups, gaps, communication needs Develop next steps
Freshwater Systems
 
Agricultural Lands
 
Mine Lands
 
Partner Surveys - over the years (AppLCC)
 
5-Year Work Plan Materials (AppLCC)
Prep materials to develop 2nd 5-Year Work Plan (2016 discussions). Part of this discussion centered around the sustainability of the partnership and the question of Partner commitment/contributions.
AppLCC Legacy - Goals & 5-Year Work Plan
 
Meadows and Inundated Forest Lands
 
Grasslands and Patures
 
Issue - Invasives - DOI-NEPA
Themes outlined in the report reflect a sample of key points described in bureau submissions; this is not an exhaustive list. Specific details are included in the submissions provided by each bureau and office that responded to the questionnaire. Applicability NEPA analysis can apply to 1) actions for which prevention/control of invasive species is the primary purpose of the action, and 2) actions for which the purpose of the action is to execute program or projects, such as operations, maintenance or construction activities, during which invasive species prevention/control may not be the primary purpose but invasive species risks should be considered and minimized. Challenges to NEPA Compliance Lack of training in NEPA compliance and access to technical support; Limitations of data availability / data accessibility (e.g., site specific information, distribution and life history information, impacts, control techniques); Reductions in funding and staffing; and, o Insufficient policy and guidance to the field. Solutions to Overcome Challenges Provide additional training and guidance to appropriate staff on NEPA compliance; Support research for new methods of controls/eradication that are effective, efficient, and less damaging to non-target habitats/species; Improve methods of data sharing and make information centrally accessible; Promote coordination with other agencies; Update policy, guidance, and templates, including best management practices (BMPS) for the type of activities conducted; ensure that those BMPS can be used by all agencies; Develop Agency-wide / Regional / Large-scale plans and guidance (e.g., Programmatic EA, Programmatic EIS) from which EAs/EISs for projects can be tiered; and, Develop more options for categorical exclusion that benefit the environment (esp. for early detection and rapid response (EDRR) and control). There are others, but these are the highlights included in the report.
resolution-of-support_clinch_template-BLANK
template
Resolution of Support for the Clinch River Valley Initiative 2012
Clinch Powell
LCC Lessons Learned WG
Work Group Lead: Jean Brennan (FWS-SA). What’s worked elsewhere that we can learn from in redefining our 2nd generation Landscape Conservation Partnership? Participants: Members of the LCC community (focus on Coordinators-level). SOW to include: • Can capture the context of how partnerships evolve, 22 LCCs • Look at existing organizational development research • Think about conservation partnerships and networks more broadly {see dedicated work space: [PEOPLES] tab, [WORKSHOP] secondary navigation}