Return to Wildland Fire
Return to Northern Bobwhite site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Navigate WLFW Landscapes
Grasslands and Savannas
Aquatics
Eastern Deciduous Forests
Western Landscapes
Return to SE Firemap
Return to the Landscape Partnership Literature Gateway Website
RETURN TO LANDSCAPE PARTNERSHIP SITE
Navigate Target Species
American Black Duck
Blanding's Turtle
Bog turtle
Colorado River Mussels
Conasauga River Aquatic Species
Eastern Hellbender
Golden-Winged Warbler
Gopher Tortoise
Lesser Prairie-Chicken
Monarch Butterfly
Northern Bobwhite, Grasslands & Savannas
Northeast Turtles
Sage Grouse
Shorebirds of Louisiana Wetlands
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher
Yazoo Darter
Companion Sites
Applcc
Conservation Design
Conservation Planning Atlas
Conservation Planning and GIS Resources
Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture
Ecosystem Benefits and Risks
Energy
Nature and Society
Imperiled Aquatic Species for the UTRB
North Atlantic LCC
Science Applications Online Learning
Southeast Aquatic Resources Partnership
Tennessee River Basin
Whitewater to Bluewater
Skip to content.
|
Skip to navigation
Search Site
only in current section
Advanced Search…
Sections
Home
About
Catalog: How to use the Landscape Partnership
Services
Video: Intro to the Landscape Partnership Workspaces
Working Lands for Wildlife (WLFW) Workspaces
FAQs
Video: Welcome to the Landscape Partnership
A Video Collection on LP Tools
LP Members
Workspaces
Organizations Search
Eastern Brook Trout
Southeast Aquatic Resources Partnership SARP
Working Lands for Wildlife
Home
About
Landscapes & Wildlife
Landowner Information
Learning & Tech Transfer
News & Announcements
Workspace
Our Community
Expertise Search
Voices from the Community
Community Map
How To Use The LP Expertise Search
WLFW
Home
About
LP Members
Working Lands for Wildlife
Home
About
Our Partners and Organizations
Our Community and Expertise Search
Where We Work
Landscapes & Wildlife
Landscapes
Wildlife
Landowner Information
Landowner Forums
Landowner Resources
Landowner Feedback
Learning & Tech Transfer
General Resources and Publications
Webinars & Videos
Apps, Maps, & Data
Training Resources
News & Announcements
Events
Stories
WLFW Newsletters
Workspace
WLFW Communications Workspace
Things You Can Do in the Workspace
Our Community
WLFW
Issues
Resources
Projects
Apps, Maps, & Data
News & Events
Training
Issues
The Anchor Approach to Connectivity
Home
ANCHOR Resources
ANCHOR MAP
ANCHOR Registration Form
Wildland Fire
Nature and Society
Ecosystem Benefits & Risks
Resources
Projects
Project Search
Submit a Project
Products
Apps, Maps, & Data
Literature Gateway: A Systemic Map of Bird-Vegetation Relationships in Eastern and Boreal Forests
Bobscapes
BirdLocale
SE FireMap
Landscape Partnership Spatial Datasets
Aquatic and Freshwater Spatial Data
North Atlantic Spatial Data
Appalchian Boundary and Resource Maps
Regional and National Maps
Zip Area Maps
GIS & Conservation Planning Toolkit
Home
Conservation Planning
Tools & Resources
Planning In Practice
Data
Nature's Network
News & Events
Events
Conservation Newsletters
Training
Videos and Webinars
Training Resources Exchange
Landscape Partnership Online Learning Network
Personal tools
Log in
Jump to Child Site
Landscape Partnership
Aquatics
BirdLocale
Black Duck
Bobscapes
Bog Turtle
Eastern Deciduous Forests
Eastern Hellbender
Ecosystem Benefits & Risks
GIS & Conservation Planning Toolkit
Golden-Winged Warbler
Grasslands and Savannas
Northern Bobwhite Quail
SE FireMap
The Anchor Approach to Connectivity
The Literature Gateway
Western Landscapes
Wildland Fire
Working Lands for Wildlife
You are here:
Home
Info
Modified items
All recently modified items, latest first.
Central Hardwoods Ecosystem Vulnerability Assessment and Synthesis: A Report from the Central Hardwoods Climate Change Response Framework Project
by Caroline Dougherty, last updated: Sep 09, 2015 11:46 AM
Central Appalachians Forest Ecosystem Vulnerability Assessment and Synthesis: A Report from the Central Appalachians Climate Change Response Framework Project
by Karin Rogers, last updated: Sep 09, 2015 11:45 AM
EPA’s Report on the Environment 2008
by Caroline Dougherty, last updated: Sep 09, 2015 11:43 AM
Document: Core Team Meeting Notes, 11-21-2014
by mmallek, last updated: Sep 08, 2015 04:40 PM
Notes for November meeting
Background Materials: Riparian Restoration to Promote Climate Change Resilience in Eastern U.S. Streams
by Web Editor, last updated: Sep 08, 2015 11:15 AM
Background Materials: Assessing Future Energy Development Across the Appalachians
by Web Editor, last updated: Sep 08, 2015 11:10 AM
Webinar Image
by Matthew Cimitile, last updated: Sep 03, 2015 12:36 PM
For Webinar Landing Page
Appalachian Assessments
by Karin Rogers, last updated: Sep 01, 2015 03:04 PM
Figure 1. Conceptual diagram depicting the hydraulic fracturing process
by Jean Brennan, last updated: Sep 01, 2015 08:21 AM
from: Brian Buchanan et al., 2015
Riparian Restoration Appendix 1: Canopy Cover Statistics
by Riparian Restoration Research Team, last updated: Sep 01, 2015 08:12 AM
Canopy Cover by State.
Ecosystem Benefits and Environmental Threats Project
by Web Editor, last updated: Aug 31, 2015 09:25 PM
Risks
by Web Editor, last updated: Aug 31, 2015 09:24 PM
Literature Review of Freshwater Classification Frameworks
by The Nature Conservancy, last updated: Aug 31, 2015 12:12 PM
Identifying aquatic ecosystems requires a classification of stream and lake features into recognizable entities or categories. Although a number of nationally recognized terrestrial community classifications exist, the most accepted being the National Vegetation Classification System (Grossman et al. 1998), currently there is no national or international standard for classifying aquatic communities or ecosystems. Despite the lack of a national aquatic community classification, aquatic ecosystem classifications and frameworks have been developed at a variety of spatial scales. Their goal is often to reflect the distribution of aqutic biological communities. These assemblages recur across the landscape under similar habitat conditions and ecological processes (Higgins et al. 2005). The methods used to develop aquatic ecosystem classifications vary widely, as do the biotic and abiotic variables considered in the classifications. The classifications generally fall into two broad categories: 1) taxonomic or bio-ecosystem classifications and 2) environmental or geo-physical ecosystem classifications (Rowe and Barnes 1994); however some classifications combine aspects of both.
Shope, Tom
by Web Editor, last updated: Aug 28, 2015 02:45 PM
Jenkins, Bill
by Admin, last updated: Aug 28, 2015 02:42 PM
Schrass, Karl
by Matthew Cimitile, last updated: Aug 28, 2015 02:41 PM
Ruble, Pat
by Web Editor, last updated: Aug 28, 2015 02:39 PM
Crews, Evan
by Admin, last updated: Aug 28, 2015 02:36 PM
Day, Diana
by Admin, last updated: Aug 28, 2015 02:36 PM
Odess, Daniel
by Matthew Cimitile, last updated: Aug 28, 2015 02:34 PM
« Previous 20 items
Next 20 items »
1
...
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
...
383