Return to Wildland Fire
Return to Northern Bobwhite site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to SE Firemap
Return to the Landscape Partnership Literature Gateway Website
RETURN TO LANDSCAPE PARTNERSHIP SITE
return to main site

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections

Personal tools

You are here: Home

Modified items

All recently modified items, latest first.
Central Hardwoods Ecosystem Vulnerability Assessment and Synthesis: A Report from the Central Hardwoods Climate Change Response Framework Project by Caroline Dougherty, last updated: Sep 09, 2015 11:46 AM
 
Central Appalachians Forest Ecosystem Vulnerability Assessment and Synthesis: A Report from the Central Appalachians Climate Change Response Framework Project by Karin Rogers, last updated: Sep 09, 2015 11:45 AM
 
EPA’s Report on the Environment 2008 by Caroline Dougherty, last updated: Sep 09, 2015 11:43 AM
 
Document: Core Team Meeting Notes, 11-21-2014 by mmallek, last updated: Sep 08, 2015 04:40 PM
Notes for November meeting
Background Materials: Riparian Restoration to Promote Climate Change Resilience in Eastern U.S. Streams by Web Editor, last updated: Sep 08, 2015 11:15 AM
 
Background Materials: Assessing Future Energy Development Across the Appalachians by Web Editor, last updated: Sep 08, 2015 11:10 AM
 
Webinar Image by Matthew Cimitile, last updated: Sep 03, 2015 12:36 PM
For Webinar Landing Page
Appalachian Assessments by Karin Rogers, last updated: Sep 01, 2015 03:04 PM
 
Figure 1. Conceptual diagram depicting the hydraulic fracturing process by Jean Brennan, last updated: Sep 01, 2015 08:21 AM
from: Brian Buchanan et al., 2015
Riparian Restoration Appendix 1: Canopy Cover Statistics by Riparian Restoration Research Team, last updated: Sep 01, 2015 08:12 AM
Canopy Cover by State.
Ecosystem Benefits and Environmental Threats Project by Web Editor, last updated: Aug 31, 2015 09:25 PM
 
Risks by Web Editor, last updated: Aug 31, 2015 09:24 PM
 
Literature Review of Freshwater Classification Frameworks by The Nature Conservancy, last updated: Aug 31, 2015 12:12 PM
Identifying aquatic ecosystems requires a classification of stream and lake features into recognizable entities or categories. Although a number of nationally recognized terrestrial community classifications exist, the most accepted being the National Vegetation Classification System (Grossman et al. 1998), currently there is no national or international standard for classifying aquatic communities or ecosystems. Despite the lack of a national aquatic community classification, aquatic ecosystem classifications and frameworks have been developed at a variety of spatial scales. Their goal is often to reflect the distribution of aqutic biological communities. These assemblages recur across the landscape under similar habitat conditions and ecological processes (Higgins et al. 2005). The methods used to develop aquatic ecosystem classifications vary widely, as do the biotic and abiotic variables considered in the classifications. The classifications generally fall into two broad categories: 1) taxonomic or bio-ecosystem classifications and 2) environmental or geo-physical ecosystem classifications (Rowe and Barnes 1994); however some classifications combine aspects of both.
Shope, Tom by Web Editor, last updated: Aug 28, 2015 02:45 PM
 
Jenkins, Bill by Admin, last updated: Aug 28, 2015 02:42 PM
 
Schrass, Karl by Matthew Cimitile, last updated: Aug 28, 2015 02:41 PM
 
Ruble, Pat by Web Editor, last updated: Aug 28, 2015 02:39 PM
 
Crews, Evan by Admin, last updated: Aug 28, 2015 02:36 PM
 
Day, Diana by Admin, last updated: Aug 28, 2015 02:36 PM
 
Odess, Daniel by Matthew Cimitile, last updated: Aug 28, 2015 02:34 PM