-
Progress Report
-
Report from vendor The Nature Conservancy for Stream Classification Project for Q1, 2013.
Located in
Research
/
…
/
Quarterly Reports Folder
/
Q1 2013 Reporting Materials and TOT Reviews
-
Progress Report
-
Report from vendor The Nature Conservancy for Stream Classification Project in 4th Quarter, 2012.
Located in
Research
/
…
/
Q4 2012 Reporting Materials and TOT Reviews
/
4th Quarter, 2012 Report for Stream Classification & Mapping
-
Q1 2013 Progress Report
-
Report from Vendor of Climate Change Vulnerability Project for First Quarter of 2013.
Located in
Research
/
…
/
Q1 2013
/
Q1 2013 Report Materials
-
Q1 2013 TOT Review Summary
-
Reviews from Technical Oversight Team on this Quarterly Report.
Located in
Research
/
…
/
Q1 2013
/
Q1 2013 TOT Reviews
-
Q3 2012 Reviews By Technical Oversight Team
-
This file contains the combined technical comments of TOT members for the Energy Forecasts project.
Located in
Research
/
…
/
Q3 2012 Reporting Materials and Reviews
/
Q3 2012 Reviews by TOT Members
-
Range-wide assessment of grazing and hydrology in bog turtle wetlands
-
In December 2018, a meeting of bog turtle experts was hosted in Richmond, VA and experts across the Eastern range of the species identified as a high priority the need to better understand the benefits and potential negative impacts of livestock grazing in bog turtle inhabited wetlands. Hydrologic conditions in bog turtle wetlands emerged as a secondary concern needing more research. Recently, NRCS’ Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) awarded funds to Dr. Carola Haas leading a team of researchers at Virginia Tech University to conduct an assessment on these two topics (grazing and hydrology).
Located in
Information Materials
/
Research
/
WLFW Outcomes: Funded Research
-
Residue & Tillage Management for Wildlife (KY)
-
Job sheet
Located in
Information
/
NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials
/
Job Sheets
-
SE Gap Species-Habitat Relationships for AppLCC
-
email 3/25/13 from Ed Laurent, R4:
FYI. Note that these species-habitat relationships use the GAP land cover classification system. When considering whether or how to use these relationships for mapping and other purposes:
1) Here is the link to download version 2 of the Gap land cover map http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/gaplandcover/data/download/
2) Attached is the most recent crosswalk from NatureServe Systems to Pyne-Hunter coarse land cover classes (file attached here)
3) Here is the link to a (possibly updated) crosswalk between GAP land cover classes and NatureServe Systems. http://griffingroups.com/file/view/10333/crosswalk-between-gap-land-cover-and-natureserve-systems
Feel free to share, and let me know if you have any questions.
Located in
Cooperative
/
…
/
SC Indicator and Surrogate Species Work Group
/
Maps & GIS Materials
-
Shorebirds
-
.
Located in
Cooperative
/
…
/
SC Indicator and Surrogate Species Work Group
/
Priority Birds - AMJV revision underway March 2013
-
Side-by-Side Comparison of Resource Indicator vs Surrogate Species Approaches
-
A table with each approach compared side-by-side into steps taken/considerations in making selections of Resource Indicators (SALCC) or Surrogate Species (draft National FWS HDQ document).
Located in
Cooperative
/
…
/
SC Indicator and Surrogate Species Work Group
/
Working Documents - Merging RI/SS Approaches
