Return to Wildland Fire
Return to Northern Bobwhite site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to SE Firemap
Return to the Landscape Partnership Literature Gateway Website
return to main site

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation


Personal tools

You are here: Home / Benefits / Landscape values and sense of place

Landscape values and sense of place

Rural landscape values

A large portion of the people who live in the Appalachian region live outside cities, and these rural communities often place high value on the unique sense of place that comes from living in rural, often largely forested, places. These same communities may also value the economic activity that comes with development and industry, and when these values compete, there is often an expectation that the quality of rural life need not be eroded as landscapes change. Nonetheless, the changes that come with urbanization, energy development including gas, wind, and surface mining, and even climate change can have negative impacts on the unique sense of place and quality of life of rural communities. Ensuring that these intangible, but often crucial, values are given consideration can help guide development in ways that do not erode the social fabric of Appalachian landscapes.

Risk factors: Urbanization, surface mining, energy development, climate change.

Outdoor recreation

The abundance of natural areas, streams and rivers, and protected state and federal lands make Appalachian landscapes a prime destination for nature-based recreation activities, and nature-based tourism is a crucial economic activity in many communities. As rural landscapes and water supplies are increasingly converted to more intensive uses with urbanization, opportunities for outdoor recreation are expected to decline. At the same time, demand for such opportunities will increase with population growth in the region and in nearby large cities, stressing the capacity of natural areas and water bodies to accommodate visitors without degrading natural characteristics. This should create incentives for freshwater stream and forest restoration to enhance the capacity of landscapes to support compatible activities.

Risk factors: Urbanization, overuse, stream degradation


Brandt, L., H. He, L. Iverson, F. R. Thompson, III, P. Butler, S. Handler, M. Janowiak, P. D. Shannon, C. Swanston, M. Albrecht, R. Blume-Weaver, P. Deizman, J. DePuy, W. D. Dijak, G. Dinkel, S. Fei, D. T. Jones-Farrand, M. Leahy, S. Matthews, P. Nelson, B. Oberle, J. Perez, M. Peters, A. Prasad, J. E. Schneiderman, J. Shuey, A. B. Smith, C. Studyvin, J. M. Tirpak, J. W. Walk, W. J. Wang, L. Watts, D. Weigel, and S. Westin. 2014. Central Hardwoods ecosystem vulnerability assessment and synthesis: a report from the Central Hardwoods Climate Change Response Framework project. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-124, USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station: 254 pp.

Butler, P., L. Iverson, F. R. Thompson, III, L. Brandt, S. Handler, M. Janowiak, P. D. Shannon, C. Swanston, K. Karriker, J. Bartig, S. Connolly, W. D. Dijak, S. Bearer, S. Blatt, A. Brandon, E. Byers, C. Coon, T. Culbreth, J. Daly, W. Dorsey, D. Ede, C. Euler, N. Gillies, D. M. Hix, C. Johnson, L. Lyte, S. Matthews, D. McCarthy, D. Minney, D. Murphy, C. O'Dea, R. Orwan, M. Peters, A. Prasad, C. Randall, J. Reed, C. Sandeno, T. Schuler, L. Sneddon, B. Stanley, A. Steele, S. Stout, R. Swaty, J. Teets, T. Tomon, J. Vanderhorst, J. Whatley, and N. Zegre. 2014. Central Appalachians ecosystem vulnerability assessment and synthesis: a report from the Central Appalachians Climate Change Response Framework. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-124,USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station: 310 pp.

Cordell, H. K., V. Heboyan, F. Santos, and J. C. Bergstrom. 2011. Natural amenities and rural population migration: a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-146. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station: 23 pp.

Cordell, H. K., C. J. Betz, S. H. Mou, and D. D. Gormanson. 2012. Outdoor recreation in the Northern United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-100. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station: 74 pp.

Cordell, H. K., C. J. Betz, and S. J. Zarnoch. 2013. Recreation and protected land resources in the United States: a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR-169. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station: 198 pp.

Daniel, W. M., D. M. Infante, R. M. Hughes, Y.-P. Tsang, P. C. Esselman, D. Wieferich, K. Herreman, A. R. Cooper, L. Wang, and W. W. Taylor. 2015. Characterizing coal and mineral mines as a regional source of stress to stream fish assemblages. Ecological Indicators 50: 50-61.

Evans, J. S., and J. M. Kiesecker. 2014. Shale gas, wind and water: Assessing the potential cumulative impacts of energy development on ecosystem services within the Marcellus Play. PLOS ONE 9.

Hayden, L., S. Hendricks, M. Bowker, D. English, N. Stremple, and D. Bayless Ray. 1996. Outdoor recreation demand and supply in the region, Chapter 4, 139-176. In The Southern Appalachian Assessment Social/Cultural/Economic Technical Report. Report 4 of 5, USDA Forest Service, Southern Region: 208 pp.

Hitt, N. P., and D. B. Chambers. 2014. Temporal changes in taxonomic and functional diversity of fish assemblages downstream from mountaintop mining. Freshwater Science 33(3): 915-926.

Jackson, L. E., B. Rashleigh, and M. E. McDonald. 2012. Economic value of stream degradation across the central Appalachians. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy 42(3): 188-197.

Keyser, T., J. Malone, C. Cotton, and J. Lewis. 2014. Outlook for Appalachian-Cumberland forests: a subregional report from the Southern Forest Futures Project. General Technical Report SRS-GTR-188. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station: 83 pp.

Lindberg, T. T., E. S. Bernhardt, R. Bier, A. Helton, R. B. Merola, A. Vengosh, and R. T. Di Giulio. 2011. Cumulative impacts of mountaintop mining on an Appalachian watershed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(52): 20929-20934.

Matthews, S. N., L. R. Iverson, M. P. Peters, A. M. Prasad, and S. Subburayalu. 2014. Assessing and comparing risk to climate changes among forested locations: Implications for ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology 29(2): 213-228.

Pond, G. J., M. E. Passmore, F. A. Borsuk, L. Reynolds, and C. J. Rose. 2008. Downstream effects of mountaintop coal mining: Comparing biological conditions using family-and genus-level macroinvertebrate bioassessment tools. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27(3): 717-737.

Townsend, P. A., D. P. Helmers, C. C. Kingdon, B. E. McNeil, K. M. de Beurs, and K. N. Eshleman. 2009. Changes in the extent of surface mining and reclamation in the Central Appalachians detected using a 1976–2006 Landsat time series. Remote Sensing of Environment 113(1): 62-72.

Villamagna, A. M., B. Mogollon, and P. L. Angermeier. 2014. A multi-indicator framework for mapping cultural ecosystem services: The case of freshwater recreational fishing. Ecological Indicators 45: 255-265.

Wickham, J. D., K. H. Riitters, T. G. Wade, M. Coan, and C. Homer. 2007. The effect of Appalachian mountaintop mining on interior forest. Landscape Ecology 22(2): 179-187.

Wickham, J. D., and C. H. Flather. 2013. Integrating biodiversity and drinking water protection goals through geographic analysis. Diversity and Distributions 19(9): 1198-1207.

Zolkos, S. G., P. Jantz, T. Cormier, L. R. Iverson, D. W. McKenney, and S. J. Goetz. 2015. Projected tree species redistribution under climate change: Implications for ecosystem vulnerability across protected areas in the Eastern United States. Ecosystems 18(2): 202-220.